Skip to content

LANGZEIT Batterien LZ100-L-A, 12.8 V 100 Ah LiFePO4, 10 kg review

A 12.8 V 100 Ah LiFePO4 battery published with two cycle figures at two depths, a maximum charge current in amps, and a stated 12-year design life.

The bottom line The only battery in this family to publish its cycle life at two depths, which is the honest form of that claim. It publishes no discharge current, so the one thing it cannot tell you is what inverter it will support.

A 100 Ah LiFePO4 pack from the same catalogue family as the EXAKT, with a different emphasis in its numbers.

Two depths, published together

15000 cycles at 10 % depth of discharge, 8500 at 30 %. Publishing both is what turns a cycle claim into information: the figure is not a property of the cells alone but of how hard they are worked, and the gap between these two numbers shows it.

What fits

260 × 168 × 217 mm, 10 kg, M8 internal thread, positive on the left. Everything needed to decide whether it replaces an existing battery, in one bullet.

What is missing

A discharge current. The listing gives a maximum charge current of 100 A and nothing in the other direction. On a battery bought to run an inverter, that is the figure the purchase turns on, and it is absent.

Also absent: any charging temperature threshold, on a pack the fifth bullet offers for motorhomes, marine use and camping.

The claim without a basis

A twelve-year design life, stated as a conclusion. The cycle numbers above it are the evidence that would support such a claim; the two are not connected on the page.

Availability

German Amazon store quoted about 172 € when this page was compiled.

British and Italian Amazon catalogues carry an entry for it, with nobody selling.

American, French and Spanish Amazon stores returned nothing at all, so the buy button there runs a search instead of landing on an empty page.

These figures are what Keepa reported on the day this page was last updated. Availability and pricing move without notice.

Prices quoted in this text were read on 16 September 2026. The live price is at the top of the page.

What it gets right, and what it leaves out

Strengths

  • Two cycle figures at two depths, which shows the trade-off instead of selecting the flattering one
  • A maximum charge current is published in amps rather than as a C-rate
  • Weight and dimensions are both published, which the tray and the hold-down both need

Compromises

  • No discharge current at all — the figure that decides what inverter it can feed
  • No low-temperature threshold
  • The 12-year design life is stated without a cycle or capacity basis

Specifications

Nominal capacity100 Ah at 12.8 V, first bullet
Continuous and peak discharge currentNot published — the first bullet gives a maximum CHARGE current of 100 A and no discharge figure
BMS protectionsOver-heating and short-circuit protection with cell balancing, fourth bullet; no thresholds are given
Low-temperature behaviourNowhere in the listing
Cycle life15000 cycles at 10 % depth of discharge and 8500 at 30 %, first bullet — two depths published, neither with a remaining-capacity figure
TerminalsM8 internal thread with terminal bolts, positive on the left, first bullet
Dimensions260 × 168 × 217 mm and 10 kg, first bullet
Amazon referenceB0CPFXWZLP (same reference on 3 Amazon marketplaces)
EAN4260713249714

Questions owners ask about this one

Why publish two cycle numbers?

Because a cycle count is set by the depth it was tested at, and publishing two shows how steeply the figure moves. Here, cycling to 10 % gives 15000 and cycling to 30 % gives 8500 — the same cells, described honestly at two working depths.

Does a missing discharge current matter?

It is the figure that decides what the battery can feed. A 100 Ah pack behind a 2000 W inverter is asked for well over 150 A at 12 V, and whether the management system permits that is not stated anywhere on this listing.