Skip to content

DEYE SUN-M80G4-EU-Q0, 800 W, two MPPT review

An 800 W micro-inverter with two independent MPPT inputs, a stated peak efficiency of 96.5 % and MPPT efficiency above 99 %, in an IP67 fanless housing.

The bottom line A well-specified converter sold by a reseller whose listing omits the two things that decide whether it can be installed: a grid standard and an input window. The efficiency figures are published properly and the fanless IP67 housing is the right construction.

An 800 W micro-inverter from a maker whose name appears only in the title.

What the sheet gets right

Two independent MPPT channels, so two panels facing different ways each run at their own best point. A peak conversion efficiency of 96.5 % and a separate MPPT efficiency above 99 %. IP67 with passive cooling — no fan, which on a device bolted behind a panel for a decade is the right decision.

What it never states

Any grid standard. A micro-inverter is the one product on this shelf whose legality depends on how it behaves when the mains misbehaves, and that behaviour is defined by a national grid code. Three of the seven micro-inverters here name one; this is not among them.

Nor any input voltage window. Without a range, the panels that will actually start it cannot be identified before purchase.

The naming

Amazon records VENDOMNIA as the brand. The title and every bullet describe a DEYE SUN-M80G4-EU-Q0. VENDOMNIA is the seller; this page carries DEYE.

Where it sits

Against the identical unit sold at a higher price with a 5 m cable, and against the Hoymiles and APsystems units that publish more. On specification alone it is mid-table; on price it is the entry point.

Availability

German Amazon store quoted about 64 € when this page was compiled.

American, British, French, Italian and Spanish Amazon stores returned nothing at all, so the buy button there runs a search instead of landing on an empty page.

These figures are what Keepa reported on the day this page was last updated. Availability and pricing move without notice.

Prices quoted in this text were read on 16 September 2026. The live price is at the top of the page.

What it gets right, and what it leaves out

Strengths

  • A peak conversion efficiency and a separate MPPT efficiency are both published
  • Fanless passive cooling in an IP67 housing, which removes the part most likely to fail outdoors
  • The lowest-priced micro-inverter in this family

Compromises

  • No grid standard named at all, on a device that connects to a household socket
  • No input voltage window, so panels cannot be matched to it before buying
  • No warranty term stated

Specifications

Rated output800 W rated AC output, first bullet
InputsTwo solar inputs feeding two independent trackers, first bullet; per-input limits are not published
LimitsNowhere in the listing — no input voltage window, no maximum input current and no output cap are stated
MPPT channelsTwo independent MPPT channels, first bullet, at a stated MPPT efficiency above 99 %
Certified grid standardsNowhere in the listing — no grid code or standard is named
MonitoringIntegrated 2.4 GHz WiFi with an application and cloud platform, third bullet
Ingress ratingIP67 with passive fanless cooling, fourth bullet
WarrantyNowhere in the listing
Amazon referenceB0CTCPSWKY (same reference on 1 Amazon marketplace)
EAN4255656224041

Questions owners ask about this one

Why does a missing grid standard matter?

Because a micro-inverter must disconnect when the mains voltage or frequency leaves a permitted range, and that behaviour is defined by a grid code specific to each country. A unit that names none cannot be checked against the rules where you live.

What is the difference between 96.5 % and “over 99 %”?

The first is conversion efficiency — how much of the DC becomes AC. The second is MPPT efficiency — how close the tracker gets to the panel’s best operating point. They multiply rather than compete, and publishing both is more honest than publishing either alone.