Skip to content

UGREEN Nexode 100 W GaN, four ports review

A four-port 100 W GaN charger quoted as taking a 14-inch MacBook Pro from 0 to 50 % in 27 minutes, with a Red Dot design award named.

The bottom line A four-port GaN charger with a specific, half-checkable charging claim and a design award in place of a specification. The split between its four ports — the thing a four-port charger is bought for — is not published.

A four-port charger with one good claim and one decorative one.

The claim worth something

A 14-inch MacBook Pro from 0 to 50 % in 27 minutes. It names a device and gives a result, which is more than five of the seven chargers here manage. It omits the model year and the cable, both of which move the number, so it is indicative rather than reproducible.

The claim worth nothing

A Red Dot design award, in the first bullet, before the wattage. A jury’s view of appearance and concept. It is published, so it is reported; it is not a specification and it does not appear in the lines above.

The gap all four multi-port chargers share

The split. 100 W across four ports, with 100 W available on one alone, and no statement of what happens when two, three or four are in use. That allocation is the entire reason to buy a four-port charger over a single-port one, and none of the four here publishes it.

And the cable

Not mentioned, as with most of this family. A 100 W charger without a 100 W cable delivers less, quietly.

Availability

German, French, Italian and Spanish Amazon stores quoted 34 € to 37 € when this page was compiled.

British Amazon store carries it too, priced in its own currency, which the euro range above deliberately omits.

American Amazon store returned nothing at all, so the buy button there runs a search instead of landing on an empty page.

These figures are what Keepa reported on the day this page was last updated. Availability and pricing move without notice.

Prices quoted in this text were read on 16 September 2026. The live price is at the top of the page.

What it gets right, and what it leaves out

Strengths

  • A specific charge claim with a named device and a time — 14-inch MacBook Pro, 0 to 50 % in 27 minutes
  • Four ports on a 100 W GaN body
  • An established maker with a wide accessory range for the same connectors

Compromises

  • No sharing split across four ports
  • A design award is not a performance specification
  • No cable mentioned, and no dimensions

Specifications

Total output100 W maximum, first bullet
Per-port wattage100 W maximum on a single port, first bullet; per-port figures for the other three are not published
SharingFour ports, from the title; the split is not published
Power Delivery profilesNowhere in the listing
PPSNowhere in the listing
ConstructionGaN, from the title; a Red Dot award is named in the first bullet
DimensionsNowhere in the listing — described as compact
Cable requirementsNowhere in the listing
Amazon referenceB091TV6LWN (same reference on 5 Amazon marketplaces)
EAN6957303847471

Questions owners ask about this one

Is the 27-minute claim checkable?

Partly. It names a device — a 14-inch MacBook Pro — and a result, which is more than most. What it omits is the model year and the cable used, both of which change the answer. It is a better claim than most here and not a reproducible one.

What does a Red Dot award tell me?

That a design jury liked it. It describes appearance and concept, not conversion efficiency, thermal behaviour or port allocation. It is reported here because it is published, and it is not carried into the specification lines.